Tales of Forgotten Scottish History

Tales of Forgotten Scottish History

Share this post

Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
How Did Bruce Justify His Claim to Be “Of the Blood of Alexander III”?

How Did Bruce Justify His Claim to Be “Of the Blood of Alexander III”?

Bagtown Clans's avatar
Bagtown Clans
Jan 17, 2025
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
How Did Bruce Justify His Claim to Be “Of the Blood of Alexander III”?
Share

The death of Alexander III in 1286 marked a catastrophic turning point for Scotland. The accidental fall from his horse not only ended his reign but also plunged the kingdom into a period of uncertainty and power struggles. With no surviving sons and his granddaughter, Margaret, Maid of Norway, still a child living abroad, Scotland faced a contentious battle over succession. Among those asserting their right to the throne was Robert Bruce, Earl of Carrick. His claim, grounded in his descent from David of Huntingdon, a younger brother of King William I, was accompanied by political and military maneuvers to strengthen his position. This article explores the genealogical foundation of Bruce’s claim, his strategies to assert legitimacy, and the broader implications for Scotland during this turbulent period.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Tales of Forgotten Scottish History to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Bagtown Clans
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share