Forged in Blood: The Clan Montgomery vs. Clan Cunningham Feud
Scotland been home to its fair share of feuds and conflicts throughout the ages. One such feud that spanned centuries and left a lasting impact on Scottish history is the Montgomery vs. Cunningham feud. We will delve into the origins, key events, and eventual resolution of this historic feud, shedding light on the rivalries, betrayals, and ultimately, the unification of these two prominent Scottish clans.
Read the new article from our daily premium feed : Fights and Forays of Branxholm
Origins of the Feud (1488)
Our journey through time begins in 1488 when the feud between the Montgomery and Cunningham Clans first took root. It all started with the awarding of the title of Baillie of Cunninghame to the son of Lord Montgomery, a title traditionally held by the Cunninghames. This act of granting the title to the Montgomerys signaled the beginning of hostilities between the two clans. But what lay beneath this seemingly innocuous event was a deeper rift that had been brewing for some time.
The Cunninghames had lost favor with the crown due to their support for King James III against his son, James IV, during the Battle of Sauchieburn. As a result, they were stripped of their titles and privileges. The Montgomerys, on the other hand, had aligned themselves with James IV and were rewarded with the coveted title.
Escalation of Tensions (1490s-1528)
As tensions simmered, the Cunninghames sought to reclaim what they believed was rightfully theirs—the title of Baillie of Cunninghame. The Montgomerys, however, were not eager to relinquish their newfound power and privileges. This led to a series of confrontations and retaliatory acts.
One notable incident occurred when the Montgomerys, unable to draw the Cunninghames into a direct battle, took matters into their own hands. They marched to the Castle of Kerelaw, situated in Cunningham territory, and set it ablaze. The occupants inside were caught off guard and unable to defend their stronghold, resulting in a significant blow to the Cunninghame Clan.
In 1499, Cuthbert Cunninghame led a group that attacked a branch of the Montgomery Clan located at Irvine, Ayrshire. The Montgomerys, undeterred by these attacks, continued to seek vengeance by resorting to brutal tactics. They murdered Edward Cunningham of Acheharvie in 1526 and Archibald Cunningham of Waterstoun in 1528.
The Loss of Eglinton Castle (1528)
One of the most significant turning points in the feud occurred in 1528 when William Cunningham, the 4th Earl of Glencarin, launched a daring attack on Eglinton Castle, which was held by the Montgomerys. The castle was not only a symbol of their power but also housed valuable clan papers and artifacts.
Hugh Montgomery, the chief of the Montgomery Clan, was present at the time of the attack but managed to escape with his family. However, the castle was lost in the flames, and with it, the irreplaceable historical records and treasures. The Montgomery Clan did not take this loss lightly, and as retribution, they were awarded a cash settlement by the crown.
This financial compensation enabled Hugh Montgomery to rebuild the castle, but the loss of their historic records was a wound that would never fully heal.
Escalating Violence and Revenge (Late 16th Century)
As the feud dragged on, acts of violence and revenge became more frequent. In 1586, the feud reached a horrifying climax with the murder of Hugh Montgomerie, the 4th Earl of Eglinton. He was en route to Stirling Castle, following a summons from the King to join the royal court, and decided to spend the night at Lainshaw Castle, owned by his relative Neil Montgomerie, Lord of Lainshaw.
Neil Montgomerie was married to a member of the Cunninghame family, Elizabeth Cunninghame. As Hugh departed from Lainshaw Castle, Lady Elizabeth or one of her servants unfurled a white tablecloth from the castle's heights—a signal that was not lost on a waiting group of 30 Cunninghame Clansmen. They ambushed Hugh Montgomery as he crossed Annick Ford, ruthlessly hacking down his servants with swords and fatally shooting the Montgomery chief.
This brutal act of treachery and violence set in motion a series of revenge killings by the Montgomery Clan. Cunninghame Clan members, their friends, and supporters were targeted without mercy. In a move that added to the tragedy, the chief of the Cunninghame Clan distanced himself from the conspirators, allowing many of them to be killed or forced into exile, with their lands being forfeited to the Montgomerys.
Efforts at Resolution (16th-17th Century)
Despite the devastating consequences of the feud, the crown and parliament attempted to bring about a resolution. However, their efforts proved futile as the deeply ingrained animosities between the two clans resisted all attempts at reconciliation. Revenge and bloodshed continued to be the order of the day.
The End of the Feud (1661)
It would take several more decades for the feud to finally reach its conclusion. In 1661, a remarkable event occurred that marked the end of the centuries-long conflict. William Cunningham, the 9th Earl of Glencairn, made a momentous decision—he married Margaret Montgomery, the daughter of the 6th Earl of Eglinton.
This marriage not only united the two prominent Scottish clans but also symbolized the end of hostilities and the beginning of a new era of cooperation and reconciliation. It was a powerful testament to the potential for unity even in the face of deep-seated feuds that had torn families and communities apart for generations.
Conclusion
The Montgomery vs. Cunningham feud is a compelling chapter in Scottish history, replete with intrigue, betrayal, and bloodshed. It is a testament to the enduring power of family pride and clan loyalty, which, when left unchecked, can fuel conflicts for generations. Yet, it also serves as a reminder that even the most bitter rivalries can find resolution through unexpected events, such as the marriage that finally brought peace to these feuding clans in 1661.
