In June of 1679, on the narrow stone arc of Bothwell Bridge, a moment of brutal clarity came upon the Covenanting movement in Scotland. The rebellion—energized by faith but weakened by infighting—met the organized might of the Crown’s forces. The result was not just a military defeat. It was a psychic wound that haunted a generation of Scots, both in life and in conscience.
To read the personal account of Janet Hamilton, wife of Alexander Gordon of Earlstoun, is to step into the echo of that loss. Her reflections, though written years later, remain shaped and shadowed by the tragedy at Bothwell Bridge. For those like her husband, and especially her brother, Sir Robert Hamilton, the battle became a spiritual Rubicon: a test of conviction, of unity, and of the cost of bearing true testimony.
Faith Fractured Before the First Shot
Before the first musket ball flew, the Covenanter army was already deeply divided. The rebellion that led to Bothwell Bridge was not simply about resisting King Charles II’s interference in church governance—it was about what kind of resistance was righteous.
Sir Robert Hamilton, Janet's brother, led the insurgent army and insisted on purity above all. He demanded that any soldiers who were not wholly committed to the most uncompromising Covenanting ideals be turned away. Those who had shown signs of prior "defection"—even minor cooperation with the government—were purged. In his view, to win with worldly compromise was worse than to lose in godly purity.
This rigid idealism splintered the rebels. What had begun as a passionate movement to defend spiritual liberty became a bitterly contested ideological battleground. Men debated not just tactics but theology. The fight for unity had become a fight among brethren.
Janet Hamilton saw this clearly and bitterly: “If my man had been as my brother on that day,” she writes, “he would have taken up his testimony against the defections, even to the dividing of the brethren and the losing of the battle.”
Indeed, the battle was lost—quickly and definitively.
The Battle Itself: Brief and Bitter
The government army, under the Duke of Monmouth and John Graham of Claverhouse (later “Bonnie Dundee”), had cannons, cavalry, and cohesion. The Covenanters had a divided leadership, poor discipline, and little ammunition.
The confrontation lasted just a few hours. The bridge was held stubbornly by a handful of rebels at first. But once the Crown’s troops broke through, the rout was complete. Around 400 Covenanters were killed or wounded, and thousands fled across moors and fields. Some were later hunted down; others taken prisoner.
Among the survivors was Alexander Gordon, Janet’s husband—wounded, exhausted, and disillusioned. He escaped Hamilton only through the intervention of an ungodly former retainer and a ridiculous (but effective) disguise as a woman. His father, also named Alexander Gordon, had died at the battle. The younger Gordon’s body bore the pain of the day; his soul bore its legacy.
For Janet, the shame was not in the loss, but in the cause of it: “Ah, if my man had been as my brother…” she laments. In her view, Sandy Gordon was too compromised, too worldly, too unwilling to stake his life on doctrinal purity. This haunted her perhaps more than the battle itself.
Haunted in Hideouts and Hearths
Bothwell Bridge did not end the Covenanting resistance—it merely scattered it. For the next decade, survivors of the battle lived as fugitives. Many fled abroad. Others, like Sandy Gordon, remained in Scotland, hiding in trees, secret chambers, and even women's clothing.
Janet Hamilton’s writings reveal the spiritual torment that followed the physical one. While Sandy remained active, and even valorous, his wife grieved over his moral compromises. He made pacts with persecutors. He swore soldiers to secrecy. He allowed symbols like the "white flag on double staves" to replace true testimony.
“Even I myself,” Janet wrote, “tender of conscience though I be… am but a poor weak woman.” Yet her deep, unwavering grief stemmed not from physical hardship, but from what she perceived as spiritual betrayal. The Covenant had been more than a cause—it was a divine contract. To compromise was to fail God.
The war waged in her own house: between a husband's pragmatism and a wife's purity. Between survival and sanctity. Between love and doctrine. And always—always—the memory of Bothwell Bridge loomed, a constant reminder of what was lost when the cause was fractured.
A Generation in the Grip of Guilt
The battle’s physical casualties were obvious. But its emotional and spiritual toll rippled quietly for years.
Men like Sandy Gordon bore the marks of guilt—not only for who they’d killed or failed to protect, but for the spiritual shortcuts they had taken to survive. Women like Janet Hamilton carried a different burden: the fear that they had betrayed their God through silence, or lies, or even maternal love.
For Janet, to swear a false oath to protect Sandy was tantamount to damnation. She writes with terrifying clarity: “I perjured my soul to save my man. Yet if so be that He forgive the perjurer and forswearer in That Day, I may indeed be grateful for His mercy–but I shall certainly think less of Him as the God of Justice.”
That one sentence speaks volumes. The God Janet believed in was not warm. He was not understanding. He was righteous, vengeful, and exacting. And she feared she had failed Him. That fear colored her every reflection, even as she continued to support her husband in body, if not always in belief.
Even the faithful preachers—Alexander Peden, Richard Cameron, and others—come under her scrutiny. They too had, in her eyes, made peace with too much deceit. They too had fallen under the long shadow of Bothwell Bridge.
In the end, the battle was not just one day’s conflict, but a fault line across an era. It marked the collapse of unity, the rise of internal judgment, and the erosion of idealism into secrecy and skirmishes. It broke the spine of a movement, and haunted the hearts of its most devoted.
The defeat at Bothwell Bridge may have ended in blood and exile, but the deeper wounds lingered in Scotland’s soul—in its sermons, its family conversations, and its prayers whispered under breath. Janet Hamilton’s sorrowful voice echoes across centuries as both a witness and a warning.
One can almost hear her still: “Woe is me, for Scotland is poor indeed and fallen very low.”