Tales of Forgotten Scottish History

Tales of Forgotten Scottish History

Share this post

Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
Why Didn't James IV Destroy Twizel Bridge?

Why Didn't James IV Destroy Twizel Bridge?

Bagtown Clans's avatar
Bagtown Clans
Jul 06, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
Tales of Forgotten Scottish History
Why Didn't James IV Destroy Twizel Bridge?
Share

On September 9th, 1513, the fate of a nation hinged—perhaps literally—on a single stone bridge. Twizel Bridge, an unassuming structure spanning the River Till near its junction with the Tweed in Northumberland, remains intact today. But over five centuries ago, it offered a vital crossing for the English army under the Earl of Surrey to outflank a superior-positioned Scottish host led by James IV. History records that the Scottish king could have destroyed the bridge and crippled the English movement. He didn’t.

Why not?

This single strategic omission is one of the most baffling decisions in British military history. And unlike the many uncertainties that plague medieval chronicles, this one is tangible. Twizel Bridge still stands—a mute witness to royal hesitation, miscalculation, or pride.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Tales of Forgotten Scottish History to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Bagtown Clans
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share